392 looks

Discussion in 'The SRTConnection Lounge' started by bee0912, Oct 15, 2011.

  1. Oct 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM #1
    bee0912

    bee0912 Rumble Bee 0912

    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Am I the only one who thinks that the 2011 392 motor is ugly? The prior 6.1L is so sexy and then they come out with a huge ball of plastic for 2011? More power or what I will take my 6.1 any day.
    Thoughts?
     
  2. Oct 15, 2011 at 4:43 PM #2
    SRTLUVR

    SRTLUVR Detailing "Go-to" Guy

    Messages:
    3,018
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL
    I agree. The simplicity of the manifold on our 6.1s are waaaaaaaaaaaay better looking. Cool part is, nobody knows what lurks under them either, lol. :D
     
  3. Oct 15, 2011 at 10:48 PM #3
    TNCHARGER

    TNCHARGER Moderator

    Messages:
    4,000
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Location:
    East TN
    Yeah...that is what I will tell my brother when his 2012 SRT delivers next week...that 392 would look good if it were in my engine bay...:baby:
     
  4. Oct 17, 2011 at 9:02 AM #4
    bucky440

    bucky440 Full Access Member

    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    The look is "understated" I don't think many people will be seeing this look due to the insane pricing...$54,500 for a loaded 300 srt8 and up to $60,000 for the Jeep.